This happy message concludes our series of Happy Hillary Meal. After a short break we'll continue with Obama. If that's gonna be the case! Stay in touch, camaradas!
03 Jun, 2008 | Read more | Mujer |
Hillary Days Are Over!
Hillary
Una mujer blanca la mejor pagada
Hillary's Days Are Counted and Over!
Juntos con Hillary, Una Vida Mejor por Mujeres!
Hitlary Rallying her International Peace-Keeping Troops
Hillary has years of experience:
as military commander-in-chief --
she also worked overseas ...
Hitlary will be a great President: she has many years of military experience, international work done by her in Europe is beyond any doubt. She's ready to start performing her duty on Day One!
28 Jan, 2008 | Mujer |
as military commander-in-chief --
she also worked overseas ...
President Hitlary Rallying her Troops
Hitlary will be a great President: she has many years of military experience, international work done by her in Europe is beyond any doubt. She's ready to start performing her duty on Day One!
28 Jan, 2008 | Mujer |
Will Hillary Be a Good President?
Hillary was taking her horse-riding class,
all Presidents, Queens and Princes can ride horses --
when something wonderful attracted her attention ...
First it is absolutely necessary to clarify that Hillary Rodham Clinton will not be the first woman who tries her luck and offers herself as a candidate to the presidency in the history of this United States. According to the Book for Madam President (Laying way for Mrs. President), that honor falls on Victory Clafin Woodhull, that was candidate in 1872, when the women in the United States not even had right to the vote. In 1984, vice-president Walter Mondale - democratic presidential candidate shook the American political establishment when he chose to Geraldine Ferraro (congressman of New York) to accompany it in the list like candidate to the vice-presidency. Mondale and Ferraro lost to Ronald Reagan and George Bush (Dogbya's father). Elizabeth Dole (republican senator) looked for the nomination of its party in 2000, following the death of her husband, Robert Dole, who had been the republican candidate in 1996. Carol Moseley-Braun (ex- senator) of the democratic side in 2004. Both failed miserably.
You can't ignore the powerful forces standing behind Hillary as a presidential candidate:
Hillary will be formidable adversary, indeed. Both candidacies of Dole and Moseley-Braun were weak, but they served at least to open the way for the candidacy of Hillary. American political analysts use phrases as a 800 pounds gorilla to describe the political weight of Hillary, that obvious will be a formidable candidate to the presidency of the United States, Hillary would not be a mere symbolic figurehead like the widows and daughters seen in Panama, Nicaragua, India and the Philippines, but would either be a real tough-minded woman, like Margaret Thatcher of England, Golda Meir of Israel and Michelle Bachelet of Chile.
From the other hand, Hitlary has serious weaknesses:
First, she is woman. Of this it will not be spoken aloud, but the latent prejudice is there. Although this last election in the United States increased significantly I number of women in the Senate and the House of Representatives (that will be presided over for the first time by a woman, Nancy Pelosi), 86 of the 535 legislators is only women and would seem to have a glass ceiling that she prevents them to arrive at the presidency. Gloria Steinem, activist feminist, observed that the black men obtained the vote 50 years before the women in the United States.
Samuel Popkin, of the University of California in San Diego, noticed that a candidate woman will have more acceptance if she is republican and if she defends traditional values, if she is a North American Margaret Thatcher. (That is not Hillary). Thomas Schaller, of the University of Maryland in Baltimore, agreed in that it will be easier that the republicans advance a woman, but thought that for 2008, the possible candidacy of the republican Condoleezza Rice (Secretary of State) has been very debilitated by the war in Iraq.
Another weakness of Mrs. Hitlary is the other face of its expensive half, that is that she - like all married woman load with the weaknesses of its husband. One has already seen in the American policy that although the political spouses they are very well carried, not therefore the spouses. To the husband of Geraldine Ferraro they found turbid businesses him; it was condemned by fraud. To the husband of congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton it was discovered to him that he had not paid his taxes. To the husband of Jeanine Pirro (candidate in east New York) it to the jail by fraud in its taxes.
In the case of Hillary, the weaknesses of their Billary husband do not incline towards the fraudulent businesses, but towards another side, known sex-predator. Hillary was faithful to the cause when Billary had his well-known adventures in the White House (and still there are many spots on the carpets in that Oval Office and the Lincoln bedroom) but he commits some new imprudence, the one that will pay broken plates will be Hillary. In addition, there are some who they question what would be the roll of Billary under a presidency of Hillary. He is ridiculous to think that it would assume the role of the “First Lady” - that is being eager to serving tea and redecorating the alcoves of the White House but well he will not be received in the functions of the agent chief executive.
From her very first days as the first lady, Hillary is figure most hated by the American rightists. The surveys show continuously that 40% of the citizens will never vote for her and in the Internet the pages Web dedicated to the I hate Hillary (hatred to Hitlary), complete with caps, transfers and Heil Hitlary T-shirts. Crude jokes circulate on “Hitlary” they much more accuse and it of opportunist, ambitious, Nazi, fascism, corrupt, and leftist. They criticize also her for being cold and unlikable, in the American politics an important factor is that the candidate (or the candidate) is somebody with whom a common citizen wanted to take a beer. Not with Hitlary, sure 'nough! Nobody sees that class of charisma in Hillary.
The American right is delirious of happiness before the prospectus of which the democrats choose to Hillary for 2008. The evangelical Jerry Falwell said not even in September that Lucifer since candidate would do more than Hitlary to mobilize her Evil Forces to the religious right. Hitlary can win, maintains Hagstrom, because she has shown to be a person who works hard, that knows to gain to the people, and who are not that much liberal at all. Then, for which Hillary is so polarizing? Because she defends positions against Dogbya - on abortion, homosexuality and control of arms, by example that the right detests, Hagstrom responds. The Popkin analyst adds that they suffer some it because they feel that she only has arrived where is in favor of its husband, a reflection more of that dynastic shade that dims the candidacy of Hillary. Perhaps that is why, people want to see new faces and that is part of the phenomenon of Baraka, argues Schaller.
To the point: why it is that Hillary can win? In the politics everything is possible, but the weaknesses of Hillary cause that many democrats fear that to name it for the presidency in 2008 will mean safe defeat. It is perceived that she has sufficient liberal support more to gain the nomination, but that never will have sufficient preservative support to gain the election. She has tried to position herself to the center to more gain support of the right, but that is a knife of double edge; now that the war in Iraq is the most powerful weapon of the democrats against the republicans, to Hillary it costs to him to explain why she voted in the Senate to authorize the war. (Barack does not have that problem because he had not arrived at the Senate by that time yet).
27 Jan, 2008 | Read more | Mujer |
all Presidents, Queens and Princes can ride horses --
when something wonderful attracted her attention ...
First it is absolutely necessary to clarify that Hillary Rodham Clinton will not be the first woman who tries her luck and offers herself as a candidate to the presidency in the history of this United States. According to the Book for Madam President (Laying way for Mrs. President), that honor falls on Victory Clafin Woodhull, that was candidate in 1872, when the women in the United States not even had right to the vote. In 1984, vice-president Walter Mondale - democratic presidential candidate shook the American political establishment when he chose to Geraldine Ferraro (congressman of New York) to accompany it in the list like candidate to the vice-presidency. Mondale and Ferraro lost to Ronald Reagan and George Bush (Dogbya's father). Elizabeth Dole (republican senator) looked for the nomination of its party in 2000, following the death of her husband, Robert Dole, who had been the republican candidate in 1996. Carol Moseley-Braun (ex- senator) of the democratic side in 2004. Both failed miserably.
Hillary for President? Really?
You can't ignore the powerful forces standing behind Hillary as a presidential candidate:
- She has both her husband Bill and his girlfriend Monica at her side.
- She is brave and capable in the military art of campaigning, she surprised many with her victorious and vicious attacks against Senator Obama.
- She sports Hitler-style moustache to look more commander-en-chiefly.
- She has already mounted and launched her formidable political machinery with the best strategists and many million dollars in her wallet.
Hillary will be formidable adversary, indeed. Both candidacies of Dole and Moseley-Braun were weak, but they served at least to open the way for the candidacy of Hillary. American political analysts use phrases as a 800 pounds gorilla to describe the political weight of Hillary, that obvious will be a formidable candidate to the presidency of the United States, Hillary would not be a mere symbolic figurehead like the widows and daughters seen in Panama, Nicaragua, India and the Philippines, but would either be a real tough-minded woman, like Margaret Thatcher of England, Golda Meir of Israel and Michelle Bachelet of Chile.
From the other hand, Hitlary has serious weaknesses:
First, she is woman. Of this it will not be spoken aloud, but the latent prejudice is there. Although this last election in the United States increased significantly I number of women in the Senate and the House of Representatives (that will be presided over for the first time by a woman, Nancy Pelosi), 86 of the 535 legislators is only women and would seem to have a glass ceiling that she prevents them to arrive at the presidency. Gloria Steinem, activist feminist, observed that the black men obtained the vote 50 years before the women in the United States.
Samuel Popkin, of the University of California in San Diego, noticed that a candidate woman will have more acceptance if she is republican and if she defends traditional values, if she is a North American Margaret Thatcher. (That is not Hillary). Thomas Schaller, of the University of Maryland in Baltimore, agreed in that it will be easier that the republicans advance a woman, but thought that for 2008, the possible candidacy of the republican Condoleezza Rice (Secretary of State) has been very debilitated by the war in Iraq.
Another weakness of Mrs. Hitlary is the other face of its expensive half, that is that she - like all married woman load with the weaknesses of its husband. One has already seen in the American policy that although the political spouses they are very well carried, not therefore the spouses. To the husband of Geraldine Ferraro they found turbid businesses him; it was condemned by fraud. To the husband of congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton it was discovered to him that he had not paid his taxes. To the husband of Jeanine Pirro (candidate in east New York) it to the jail by fraud in its taxes.
In the case of Hillary, the weaknesses of their Billary husband do not incline towards the fraudulent businesses, but towards another side, known sex-predator. Hillary was faithful to the cause when Billary had his well-known adventures in the White House (and still there are many spots on the carpets in that Oval Office and the Lincoln bedroom) but he commits some new imprudence, the one that will pay broken plates will be Hillary. In addition, there are some who they question what would be the roll of Billary under a presidency of Hillary. He is ridiculous to think that it would assume the role of the “First Lady” - that is being eager to serving tea and redecorating the alcoves of the White House but well he will not be received in the functions of the agent chief executive.
From her very first days as the first lady, Hillary is figure most hated by the American rightists. The surveys show continuously that 40% of the citizens will never vote for her and in the Internet the pages Web dedicated to the I hate Hillary (hatred to Hitlary), complete with caps, transfers and Heil Hitlary T-shirts. Crude jokes circulate on “Hitlary” they much more accuse and it of opportunist, ambitious, Nazi, fascism, corrupt, and leftist. They criticize also her for being cold and unlikable, in the American politics an important factor is that the candidate (or the candidate) is somebody with whom a common citizen wanted to take a beer. Not with Hitlary, sure 'nough! Nobody sees that class of charisma in Hillary.
The American right is delirious of happiness before the prospectus of which the democrats choose to Hillary for 2008. The evangelical Jerry Falwell said not even in September that Lucifer since candidate would do more than Hitlary to mobilize her Evil Forces to the religious right. Hitlary can win, maintains Hagstrom, because she has shown to be a person who works hard, that knows to gain to the people, and who are not that much liberal at all. Then, for which Hillary is so polarizing? Because she defends positions against Dogbya - on abortion, homosexuality and control of arms, by example that the right detests, Hagstrom responds. The Popkin analyst adds that they suffer some it because they feel that she only has arrived where is in favor of its husband, a reflection more of that dynastic shade that dims the candidacy of Hillary. Perhaps that is why, people want to see new faces and that is part of the phenomenon of Baraka, argues Schaller.
To the point: why it is that Hillary can win? In the politics everything is possible, but the weaknesses of Hillary cause that many democrats fear that to name it for the presidency in 2008 will mean safe defeat. It is perceived that she has sufficient liberal support more to gain the nomination, but that never will have sufficient preservative support to gain the election. She has tried to position herself to the center to more gain support of the right, but that is a knife of double edge; now that the war in Iraq is the most powerful weapon of the democrats against the republicans, to Hillary it costs to him to explain why she voted in the Senate to authorize the war. (Barack does not have that problem because he had not arrived at the Senate by that time yet).
27 Jan, 2008 | Read more | Mujer |